Design Highlight





Take a 6-year old Schnauzer, Bash, as an example:






To address this issue, I added color indicators to each health metric card. When a value exceeds the healthy range, the label shows how much it exceeds the limit, helping users quickly assess severity.
The dog’s avatar at the top reflects the dog’s overall real-time health, ensuring information visibility on every screen.


Enable effortless understanding of dogs' real-time health condition by:

To help users better relate the score of each category to the insights, I placed the score on each insight card.

To help users understand how to improve a score, I highlighted the improvement recommendations in the insight cards.

To help users understand how to improve a score, I highlighted the improvement recommendations in the insight cards.



To solve users' issues, instead of displaying all metric cards at once, we collapsed them and allowed users to swipe left and right to view them.
I prioritized showing the lowest-scoring metric card first to draw the user’s attention.
This change reduced the cognitive load of reading all the metrics and helped users focus on the most important information first.


Version 3 use structured image-based input to ensure accurately gathering the crucial information, while use the conversational input to ensure flexibility. I moved forward with version 3.

Users mentioned the need of going back to the previous steps because they may want to edit or add information, or chech the information they previously input.
To accomodate their needs, we added a progress bar. The progress bar not only helps users understand which stage of the AI diagnosis they are in and how many steps remain, but also allows them to easily jump to different steps. After jumping to another step, users can chat with the AI to add information, retake photos, or reselect the issue category.




To address users' issue, our AI model is able to calculate the reliability level of the diagnosis.
I designed a label here to demonstrate the reliability, and users can also click on this question mark to learn more about what reliability means.
Those design makes the AI diagnosis more transparent and trustworthy.

Result
4.6
is the average user rating.
92%
of users rate more than 4.
87%
of users believed the app helps them better understand their dog’s health condition.

























